Skip to main content

Breed Type

Ah, breed type, how elusive you are! Or are you?


One would think that Rat Terrier breeders don't even know what their dogs are supposed to look like, much less the judges! Breed type is going straight out the window in exchange for ribbons. It makes me ill to hear over and over "for the betterment of the breed" or "we breed for the standard" and even "I know structure, and my dogs are correct!" (when they have 7 differently structured Rat Terriers in their yard - from a whippet to a bull terrier!).


I will grant that the breed standard is somewhat open for interpretation, however that is for a very select few items! "Moderate" is one word that seems to stymie many breeders. I will agree that there is a range of dogs that could be considered moderate of bone and substance. However, there are dogs that fall outside of that category. If the dog looks elegant like an Italian Greyhound, then perhaps it is too fine of bone. It it looks like it could walk into a weight pull ring and beat a Staffordshire then maybe we've gone to the other side of moderate. Both dogs might have a place in a breeding program if their structure is there - each could conceivably "fix" the other - add a bit of refinement or a bit of bone to a dog that lacks that.


One thing is for certain, breed type is not being awarded in the ring except by a select few judges who know what a Rat Terrier is supposed to be and what it is supposed to look like. Flash, leg and size are getting put up over moderate, correct and typey Rat Terriers. Show ring fads have a lasting and seriously detrimental effect on the future of a breed. Irish Setters, anyone? What about German Shepherds? Smooth Fox Terriers? None of these dogs look like their standard or their ancestors due to breeders (a) allowing poor specimens or dogs with detrimental exaggerations get into the ring and (b) allowing judging to dictate the future of the breed. We now have dogs that are "typey" simply because when we think of that dog, we think of the exaggeration they have become.


I wish judges would remember that they too have a smidgen of responsibility for helping us choose our breeding stock. Weaker minds take their awards as signs of their success as breeders rather than a fun endeavor for them and their dogs.


I could ramble on for hours, but let's just get to the point! One of these things is not like the other, and for good reason:



Rat Terrier Breed Illustration from ARTA

Toy Fox Terrier

Basenji


Bull Terrier


And yes, I have seen every one of these dogs in the Rat Terrier ring at one time or another - and be awarded for their lack of type!





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

High Toes

Sometimes I get into discussions with people about dog structure and really, really, it makes me want to beat my head against a wall. However, those always make me publish those words and pictures that have been rattling around in my head for a while. Case in point – someone posted on a board that they thought that a high toe on a dog was a “cosmetic fault.” My opinion on this is fairly solid – NO! A high toe is a STRUCTUAL fault. Someone then posted that they wanted “proof.” Ah, here we go. The boondoggle of proof! Studies! Someone, somewhere, somehow agreeing or disagreeing with my point! The unfortunate thing is that it really isn’t to be found. Our Proof wanter found a website in which a couple had a Staffordshire Terrier with a high toe, and they readily admitted that the high toe caused issues with her gait, but then concluded that it was just a cosmetic issue. Hmm, really? The document can be found here , you can look at the pictures and read it for yourself. (Don't use the

All Positive - All BS

I, in my infinate inability to keep my mouth shut, offered someone training advice on a public forum for their resource guarding Rat Terrier. I told them that when he does the growling bit, calmly walk over, pick him up by the scruff of the neck, and put him in his kennel for a few hours. In my own experience with Ratties, this works pretty well because the dog learns that if you attempt to guard something, you will be corrected and then removed from your treasure and the rest of the pack. I didn't think that this was in any way controversial. Oh, how wrong I was! I found out that I might as well have told her to punt the dog like a football across the room, because that is what "scruffing" is to the "All Positive" fanatics. Of course, their suggestions would lead to reinforcement of the behavior or out and out terror. There were two camps - the first camp said to "redirect the dog's behavior by offering it a treat to give up it's treasure

Brindle and the Rat Terrier

It seems like every once in a while the topic of brindle comes up in the Rat Terrier world. Teeth are gnashed and garments are rendered because brindle is not an acceptable pattern in our breed, and the standard says that brindle is a disqualification. The standard probably won’t change any time soon, and I certainly hope that it will NEVER include brindle! Why? The UKC standard says, in the very beginning, that “These terriers probably included crosses between the Smooth Fox Terrier, the Manchester Terrier and the now extinct white English Terrier… Some of these dogs were crossed with Whippets or Italian Greyhounds (for speed) and Beagles (for hunting ability).” Let’s take a look at the ancestors of the Rat Terrier and how their standards treat brindle: Smooth Fox Terrier UKC : Serious Fault AKC: Objectionable Manchester Terrier: UKC: Disqualification AKC: Disqualification Whippet: UKC: Any color/pattern accepted. AKC: Any color/pattern accepted. Italian Greyhounds: UKC: Disqualif